Can We Have Private Constructor In Abstract Class In Java

MUAZHAN

4 min read

·

Jun 24, 2024

57

Share

Can We Have Private Constructors in Abstract Classes in Java?

The answer is yes, you can have private constructors in abstract classes in Java. But, it might not be the most intuitive thing to do, so let's dive into why this is possible and the implications:

Why You Might Want a Private Constructor

• Preventing Instantiation: Abstract classes are meant to be extended, not directly instantiated. A private constructor explicitly enforces this by making it impossible to create objects of the abstract class itself.

• Singleton Pattern: While not typical, you could use a private constructor in an abstract class to implement a singleton pattern for a factory class that handles the creation of concrete instances of subclasses.

How It Works

Java doesn't restrict abstract classes from having constructors. Here's an example:

abstract class Shape {
    private Shape() {
        // Private constructor, cannot be called directly.
        System.out.println("Shape constructor called.");
    }

    abstract double calculateArea();
}

class Circle extends Shape {
    private double radius;

    public Circle(double radius) {
        this.radius = radius;
    }

    @Override
    double calculateArea() {
        return Math.PI * radius * radius;
    }
}

In this example:

1. Shape is an abstract class with a private constructor.
2. Circle is a concrete subclass that implements the calculateArea() method.
3. You cannot directly instantiate Shape because its constructor is private.
4. You can only create instances of concrete subclasses like Circle.

Important Considerations

• No Direct Instantiation: The primary purpose of an abstract class is to provide a template for concrete subclasses. Having a private constructor reinforces this.

• Factory Pattern: While less common, using a private constructor with an abstract class for a singleton factory pattern is possible. It would manage the creation of instances of its subclasses.

• Alternatives: If you need to control object creation, consider using a factory method in an abstract class instead of a private constructor. This allows for more flexibility in object creation and initialization.

Remember: Using a private constructor in an abstract class is a valid technique, but it's important to understand its purpose and potential implications. It's essential to consider how it aligns with the overall design of your class hierarchy and application logic.